The cost of treating autism
by Ellen Harrington-Kane
In a previous post titled “Autism…should health insurance cover treatment?” — I blogged about a parent who pushed through legislation in South Carolina to provide insurance coverage for autism services in that state. Now, a bill in the Ohio House would require health insurance companies to cover autism treatment in that state too — the same way they cover other medical conditions.
A November 8 story in the Columbus Dispatch called “The cost of treating autism” lays out two views of the debate. First, it quotes an insurance industry representative who worries autism is just another cause in a list of causes some people would like to see insurers cover:
“Each individual has the belief that their cause is the one that the government needs to find the solution to,” said Kelly McGivern, president of the Ohio Association of Health Plans. “We believe employers who buy policies should make the decision.”
On the other side of the debate, the story quotes Jacquie Wynn, director of the Center for Autism Spectrum Disorders at Nationwide Children’s Hospital:
Autistic children, she said, need 30 hours to 40 hours of intervention a week. She said 30 percent of families who come to the center for treatment leave because they can’t afford it.
“There’s a cost savings in the reduction of aggressive behavior or the self-care skills they learn. With short-term, early intervention in their early years you see the payoff in their lifetime.”
We all know autism is treatable, so of course it makes sense to have health insurance cover autism. A growing number of states are instituting laws requiring coverage of autism services. Let’s hope Ohio will be next. Â